|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tromsø Satellite Station (now Kongsberg Satellite Services), Tromsø, Norway
|
|
Background
|
|
Norway, one of the world's leading producers of offshore crude oil has been
compelled to develop sophisticated procedures for identifying and tracking
oil slicks. Every year approximately 400 illegal oil spills are observed off
the coast of Norway, which pose a constant threat to the country's coastal
fisheries and extensive shorelines. Of these spills, 90% are under 1000 cubic
metres in size, and as many as five to ten require organized containment and
cleanup operations. Using satellite SAR and surveillance aircraft is one the most
promising methods used by Norway in its oil spill management efforts.
|
Total oil spill service coverage area.
|
|
|
Challenge Definition
|
|
Since 1981 Norway has used aircraft to patrol its 48,000 kilometres of shoreline
and vast ocean areas to search for oil spills. Poor weather, light conditions and
the high cost of operations over large areas limits the use of traditional airborne
surveillance. "In Norway, a combined use of aircraft and satellite SAR is the most
cost-effective choice for monitoring open seas, due to the year-round clouds and
half-year of darkness," said Jan Petter Pedersen, director of marketing at Tromsø
Satellite Station (TSS). Another challenge is the necessity of near-real time
data for effective spill management. Airborne surveillance can provide this
information but the general area of the spill must still be determined, a problem
that proved difficult for traditional aircraft surveillance techniques.
|

The wave dampening effect of oil on water creates dark patches in the imagery.
August 23, 1996 RADARSAT ScanSAR Narrow sub image. |
|
|
How RADARSAT Meets The Challenge
|
|
As early as 1991 ERS-1 imagery was demonstrating the capabilities of satellite
SAR to locate and monitor oil spills in Norway's water. Under a program to
develop effective detection techniques, TSS was asked to provide coordinates
of possible oil spills to the Norwegian Pollution Control Authority (SFT). A
system was developed that allowed ERS-1 SAR image data to be generated
within 10 minutes of reception by the TSS satellite station. By 1995, a more
advanced system had been developed that allowed images to be easily
transferred from TSS using standard e-mail. This advancement allowed the
system to become partially operational in the spill detection process.
|
Oil spill service concept model, from reception and analysis of data
at TSS, through early warning alert and aircraft operations by
SFT.
|
|
With the launch of RADARSAT in late 1995, and the implementation of
RADARSAT SAR data, the system to became even more effective.
"RADARSAT offers improved spatial and temporal coverage. It provides an
important data source to bring the project another step closer to operational
status," said Pedersen. ERS-1's single setting of 23 degree inclination and 100
metre swath had been adequate for detecting oil spills. However,
RADARSAT's flexible viewing geometry, including multiple beam modes,
allowed TSS researchers to determine the best possible combination of
resolution and angle to be used in detecting oil spills. They found that the
ScanSAR Narrow beam, with its coverage of 300x300 kilometre and resolution
of 50 metres was capable of indicating spills. The major advantage of this beam
is its ability to cover vast areas with single passes and provide a better cost per
kilometre coverage. Norway's latitude also allows at least partial coverage of
the area to be provided by ScanSAR nearly once a day. The ability to acquire
images on a daily basis and monitor an oil spill had been greatly improved.
|
|
Verification of slicks that are detected on SAR images is still provided by aircraft
equipped with Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR). "We use satellite-based SAR data
as a daily planning tool for aerial surveillance missions. Our dedicated Merlin
Fairchild IIIB aircraft is guided by possible oil spills in SAR images," said
Jørn Harald Anderson, a SFT senior executive officer. Efforts are also made by SFT
to coordinate satellite passes with aircraft flight plans for the day to avoid
possible overlapping coverage. "Satellite SAR data is particularly useful when
possible oil spills are not observed at remote oil platform locations. This
"no pollution" confirmation by satellite allows us to re-allocate flight time
to areas not covered by the satellite," said Anderson.
A possible oil spill, dark linear features, in the Baltic Sea can be seen
in this October 19, 1996 RADARSAT ScanSAR Narrow image.
|

The increase in coverage and accuracy provided by RADARSAT represents a
potential for customers, such as SFT, to be more effective in monitoring
the vast area off Norway's coast. |
|
|
For More Information...
|
|
Jan Petter Pedersen, Kongsberg Satellite Services, N-9005 Tromsø, Norway,
Telephone: 47 77 68 4817, Fax: 47 77 65 7868, E-mail:
janp@tss.no
References
Corbley, Kevin, May 1997, "Norway Enhances Oil Spill Detection with
RADARSAT", EOM, Vol. 6, Number 5, Pg. 22-26.
Credits
Information used in this profile was extracted from an article which originally
appeared in the May 1997 issue of EOM. Contact EOM at
eomaged@aol.com for subscription
information.
RADARSAT data copyright Canadian Space Agency/Agence spatiale canadienne 1996.
Received by the Canada Centre for Remote Sensing. Processed and distributed by
MDA Corporation. Imagery enhancement and interpretation by CCRS.
|
|
| |
|
|
|